Social Performance of Microfinance Institutions Improving Economic Stability of Low-Income Individuals

  • Josephmary Gade
  • Dr. J. John Adaikalam
Keywords: Microfinance institutions (MFIs), social performance, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), non-banking financial institutions (NFBIs).

Abstract

Right now, a lot of microfinance institutions (MFIs) are straying from their initial goal of reducing poverty. Considering social performance metrics as a means of addressing MFI development, the aim of this study is to identify and update significant social performance (SP) for micro-finance institutions (MFIs). Social performance metrics are more closely aligned with the organization's development and social objectives than regular performance metrics. Therefore, in order to identify critical social performance metrics that MFIs must meet in order to fulfill their social objectives, this study has examined earlier empirical research and consultancy reports pertaining to poverty reduction. This study also examines 125 MFIs that reported social performance in 2018 and 2023 using the Microfinance Information Exchange (MIX) database. According to the research, Therefore, this study offers guidance for future research in performance evaluation that balances social and financial goals in the microfinance sector. In order to support the conceptual literature that is now available, it is also a start toward performing additional research and suggesting regulation of MFIs' social performance. This will need additional empirical study utilizing micro-econometrics approaches in the future.

Author Biographies

Josephmary Gade

Research Scholar, Department of Business Administration Annamalai University, Chidambaram

Dr. J. John Adaikalam

Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, 

References

1. Armendáriz de Aghion, B., & Morduch, J. (2004). Microfinance: Where do we stand?, 135-148. Retrieved from http://www.pfsprogram.org/sites/default/files/G3_FAI_Wh ereWeStand_0.pdf
2. Bassem, B. S. (2009). Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Mediterranean countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(1), 31-43.
3. Bédécarrats, F., Baur, S., & Lapenu, C. (2011). Combining social and financial performance: A paradox? Valladolid, Spain. Retrieved from http://microcredit.momentum
4. Berenbach, S., & Churchill, C. (1997). Regulation and supervision of microfinance institutions Experiences from Latin America Asia and Africa. Washington, D.C.: USAID
5. Brau, J. C., Hiatt, S., & Woodworth, W. (2009). Evaluating impacts of microfinance institutions using Guatemalan data. Managerial Finance, 35(12), 953-974.
6. Calderón, C., & Liu, L. (2003). The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 321-334.
7. Caudill, S. B., Gropper, D. M., & Hartarska, V. (2009). Which microfinance institutions are becoming more cost effective with time? Evidence from a mixture model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(4), 651-672.
8. CGAP. (2004). Annual Report 2004. Washington, DC: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, The World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.cgap.org/gm/document- 1.9.41932/CGAP_Annual_Report_2004.pdf
9. CGAP. (2006). Good practice guidelines for funders of microfinance. Washington, DC: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, The World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.mastercardfdn.org/pdfs/Good%20Practice%20 Guidlines.pdf
10. Claessens, S. (2006). Competitive implications of cross-border banking. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3854
11. Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2007). Financial performance and outreach: A global analysis of leading microbanks. The Economic Journal, 117(517), F107-F133. Cuong, N. V. (2008). Is a governmental micro-credit program for the poor really pro-poor? Evidence from Vietnam. The
12. Daley-Harris, S. (2006). State of the microcredit summit campaign report 2006. Washington, DC: Microcredit summit campaign
13. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor.
14. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195-225.
15. Erdal, D., Oguzhan, A., & Ahmet, I. (2011). The Direction of Causality between Financial Development and Economic Growth: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Management, 28(1), 3 -19.
16. Ferreira, F. H. G., Leite, P. G., & Ravallion, M. (2010). Poverty reduction without economic growth? Explaining Brazil's poverty dynamics, 1985-2004. Journal of Development Economics, 93(1), 20-36.
17. Galema, R., Lensink, R., & Mersland, R. (2012). Do powerful CEOs determine microfinance performance? Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 718-742.
18. Gingrich, C. D. (2004). Community-based savings and credit cooperatives in Nepal: A sustainable means for microfinance delivery? Journal of Microfinance, 6(1), 21-39.
19. Hartarska, V. (2005). Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the newly independent states. World Development, 33(10), 1627-1643.
20. Hartarska, V. (2009). The impact of outside control in microfinance. Managerial Finance, 35(12), 975-989.
Published
2024-09-09
How to Cite
Josephmary Gade, & Dr. J. John Adaikalam. (2024). Social Performance of Microfinance Institutions Improving Economic Stability of Low-Income Individuals. Revista Electronica De Veterinaria, 25(1S), 1132 -1137. https://doi.org/10.69980/redvet.v25i1S.1045