“Comparative Analysis of Green Building Rating Systems in Developed and Developing Nations”

Ruchin Pandit; Dr Abhijitsinh Parmar; Dr. Shital T Shah

doi:10.69980/redvet.v24i4.1838

Ruchin Pandit
Dr Abhijitsinh Parmar
Dr. Shital T Shah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.69980/redvet.v24i4.1838

Keywords: Green building, rating systems, sustainable development

Abstract

The construction sector is one of the primary consumers of environmental resources and a significant contributor to pollution in both manmade and natural environments worldwide. In recent years, the concept of green buildings has gained substantial traction, leading to the establishment of various rating systems aimed at evaluating the sustainability of these structures. These rating systems serve to certify diverse aspects of sustainable development during the planning and construction phases, while also integrating best practices to achieve higher certification levels. This study is part of a larger research initiative with three main objectives: (1) to conduct a comparative analysis of different green building rating systems utilized in developed and developing nations, (2) to identify the roles and limitations of existing environmental building assessment methods in determining building sustainability in developing countries, and (3) to compute a sustainability and composite index using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), based on the framework proposed by Ding (2007). This paper specifically addresses the first objective, providing insights into the differences and similarities between rating systems across various regions. In the context of India, the research highlights that existing rating systems often overlook economic and climatic factors, which can impact their effectiveness. The findings of this study are intended to benefit all stakeholders engaged in the evaluation and promotion of green building practices.

Author Biographies

Ruchin Pandit

Research Scholar, Silver Oak University

Dr Abhijitsinh Parmar

Associate Professor & Head, Department of Civil Engineering, Aditya Silver Oak Institute of Technology, Silver Oak University

Dr. Shital T Shah

Principal, Apollo Institute of Engineering & Technology, Ahmedabad

References

1. Adler, A., Armstrong, J. E., Fuller, S. K., Kalin, M., Karolides, A., Macaluso, J., & Walker, H. A. (2006). Green Building: Project Planning and Cost Estimating (2nd ed.). Kingston, Mass.: R.S. Means.
2. Bauer, M., Mosle, P., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Green Building: A Guidebook for Sustainable Architecture. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 15-19.
3. Building Research Establishment. (2006). Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM). Garston, Watford, U.K. Retrieved from http://www.breeam.org.
4. Cassidy, R. (2003). White Paper on Sustainability: A Report on the Green Building Movement. Clearwater, Fla.: Reed Business Information, Building Design & Construction.
5. Ding, K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction: The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.015
6. DGNB. (2007). DNGB Rating Standard.
7. Gambatese, J. A., Rajendran, S., & Behm, M. G. (2006). Building towards sustainable safety and health. In Proceedings of the ASSE Professional Development Conference, Seattle: American Society of Safety Engineers.
8. Green Building Council of Australia. (2011). Green Star Rating Standard: Multi-Unit Residential v1. Retrieved from https://gbca.com.au.
9. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India & The Energy and Resources Institute. (2010). Introduction to National Rating System: GRIHA, An Evaluation Tool to Help Design, Build, Operate, and Maintain a Resource-Efficient Built Environment. New GRIHA Manual, Vol. 1, pp. 1-42.
10. John, A. (1992). The Sourcebook for Sustainable Design: A Guide to Environmentally Responsible Building Materials and Processes. Boston: Architects for Social Responsibility.
11. Indian Green Building Council. (2011). LEED-NC India Green Building Manual.
12. Rees, W. E. (1989). Planning for Sustainable Development: A Resource Book. Vancouver, B.C.: UBC Centre for Human Settlements.
13. Sathyanarayanan, R., Gambatese, J. A., & Behm, M. G. (2009). The impact of green building design and construction on worker safety and health. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(10), 1058-1066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:10(1058)
14. Ugwu, O. O., & Haupt, T. C. (2007). Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability: A South African construction industry perspective. Building and Environment, 42, 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.001
15. U.S. Green Building Council. (2018). LEED v4 for Building Design and Construction. Retrieved from https://www.usgbc.org.
16. Kahn, M. E., & Zheng, Z. (2020). The role of building certifications in reducing energy consumption: Evidence from the U.S. Energy Economics, 85, 104564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104564.