Patient Satisfaction and Early Outcomes Following Mini-Facelift Procedures in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Modified FACE-Q Evaluation
Abstract
The rising demand for facial aesthetic enhancements has made the mini-facelift a popular, less invasive choice compared to traditional rhytidectomy. Within oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), these procedures are increasingly used to address signs of facial aging. Despite their growing popularity, there's a clear lack of comprehensive data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), especially when assessed with validated tools in this specific surgical context. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to fill this gap by evaluating patient satisfaction and early complications after mini-facelifts, using a modified FACE-Q questionnaire tailored for facial aesthetic procedures. The study included 35 female patients, aged 45–55 years, who underwent mini-facelifts at the Department of OMFS, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College. A key part of the methodology involved adapting the FACE-Q to include OMFS-specific considerations, such as dedicated scales for recovery time and a detailed checklist for complications, including jaw stiffness, relevant due to the anatomical proximity in OMFS. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at a p-value of less than 0.05. Results showed compelling insights into patient experiences. A significant 82% of participants reported high satisfaction with their overall appearance, confirming the aesthetic effectiveness of mini-facelifts in this setting. Additionally, 78% were content with their recovery time, suggesting a generally well-tolerated post-operative course. The positive psychological impact was evident, with 85% noting a significant improvement in social confidence. Regarding complications, the most common issues were temporary numbness (34%) and jaw stiffness (12%), both typically mild and manageable. Interestingly, a borderline statistically significant association (p=0.048) suggested that younger patients (45–50 years) reported higher satisfaction. This study strongly suggests that mini-facelifts performed in an OMFS setting are associated with high patient satisfaction and a favorable, manageable complication profile. However, the study's small sample size and single-center design are limitations. These factors highlight the critical need for subsequent larger, multi-center investigations to definitively validate these preliminary findings and comprehensively assess the long-term outcomes and sustained efficacy of these procedures.
References
2. Krohner, R. G. (2003). Anesthetic considerations and techniques for oral and maxillofacial surgery.International Anesthesiology Clinics. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004311-200341030-00007
3. Pusic, A. L., Lemaine, V., Klassen, A. F., Scott, A. M., & Cano, S. J. (2011). Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Plastic Surgery: Use and Interpretation in Evidence-Based Medicine.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0B013E3182063276
4. Knoernschild, K. L., & Campbell, S. D. (2019). Making the Best Clinical Decisions for Patients: The Pros-CAT ProtocolTM.Dental Clinics of North America. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CDEN.2018.11.008
5. Pusic, A. L., Klassen, A. F., Scott, A. M., & Cano, S. J. (2013). Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q satisfaction with appearance scale: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for facial aesthetics patients.Clinics in Plastic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPS.2012.12.001
6. Campo, A. F. del, Gordon, C. B., & Bergman, O. K. (1998). Evolution from Endoscopic to Miniinvasive Facelift: A Logical Progression?Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/S002669900202
7. Sinno S, et al. Face-Lift Satisfaction Using the FACE-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(2):239–242.
8. Castro-Govea, Y., De La Garza-Pineda, O., & Salazar-Lozano, A. (2013). Mini–Temporal and Perilobular Approach to Facelift: Mini-TAPA-Facelift.Facial Plastic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0033-1347009
9. Onizuka, T., Hosaka, Y., Miyata, M., & Ichinose, M. (1995). Our mini-facelift for orientals.Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209311
10. Ifeacho, S. N., Malhi, G. K., & James, G. (2005). Perception by the public and medical profession of oral and maxillofacial surgery—has it changed after 10 years?British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BJOMS.2004.11.026
11. Zaslavskiy, I., Drobyshev, A., Dubinina, T., Erdes, S., & Kuznetsov, A. (2017, June 1).AB0423 Minimally invasive surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint in patients with various rheumatic disorders. https://doi.org/10.1136/ANNRHEUMDIS-2017-EULAR.4562
12. Anastassov, G. E., Lee, H., & Haiavy, J. (2000). Discoplasty with autogenous superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap in reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint combined with cervicofacial rhytidectomy.British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1054/BJOM.1999.0297
13. Mitz, V., & Peyronie, M. (1976). The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (smas) in the parotid and cheek area.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197607000-00013
14. Trussler, A. P., Hatef, D., Broussard, G. B., Brown, S. A., & Barton, F. E. (2011). The viscoelastic properties of the SMAS and its clinical translation: firm support for the high-SMAS rhytidectomy.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0B013E3182221354
15. Lambros, V. (1997). Fat injection for aesthetic facial rejuvenation.Aesthetic Surgery Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-820X(97)80041-6
16. Lukash, F. N. (2017). Commentary on: Safety of Cosmetic Surgery in Adolescent Patients.Aesthetic Surgery Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/ASJ/SJX088
17. Saraçoğlu, K. T., Dal, D., Cerit, K. K., Baygın, Ö., Kir, B., & Bekiroğlu, G. N. (2014). The Factors Affecting Satisfaction Level of Parents Before and After Pediatric Surgery.Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Anesthesiology Reanimation.
18. Abboushi, N., Yezhelyev, M., Symbas, J., & Nahai, F. (2012). Facelift Complications and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism: A Single Center’s Experience.Aesthetic Surgery Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X12442213
19. Sarwer, D. B., Infield, A. L., Baker, J. L., Casas, L. A., Glat, P. M., Gold, A. H., Jewell, M. L., LaRossa, D., Nahai, F., & Young, V. L. (2008). Two-year results of a prospective, multi-site investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery.Aesthetic Surgery Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASJ.2008.02.003