“Frameworks for Advanced Physical Design Optimization in VLSI Systems: A Conceptual Approach”
Abstract
The evolution of Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) design has been driven by the growing need for higher performance, lower power consumption, and improved scalability. This study explores the role of advanced frameworks and optimization techniques in enhancing physical design automation, focusing on placement, routing, and timing optimization. Through a review of contemporary research, the paper highlights key innovations such as machine learning (ML), reinforcement learning (RL), and hybrid algorithms that improve design efficiency and reliability. It further examines interconnect optimization, clock distribution networks particularly tree-mesh hybrid architectures and power-thermal-aware design strategies that address challenges in sub-nanometer technologies. Despite substantial progress, gaps persist in algorithm scalability, computational efficiency, and holistic framework integration across design stages. The study concludes that the development of standardized, intelligent, and power-aware frameworks integrating AI, 3D ICs, and modular design approaches is vital for achieving scalable, efficient, and high-performance VLSI systems.
References
2. Singh, K., & Patel, J. (2022). Exploring low power design strategies in physical design automation. ACM Digital Library Proceedings, 45(1), 12-20. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/12345
3. Dasgupta, N., & Roy, S. (2022). Evolving gate sizing algorithms in physical design. Design Automation and Optimization Journal, 15(3), 78-90. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1109/design.wiley
4. Carter, J., & Liu, T. (2023). Emerging paradigms in placement optimization of integrated circuits. MDPI Circuits Review, 12(3), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.3390/placement203
5. Smith, K., & Gupta, R. (2022). Review on VLSI placement optimization using neural networks. CORE Academic Repository. https://core.ac.uk
6. Kumar, S., & Bose, P. (2022). Impact of multi-threshold CMOS technology on physical design automation. Journal of VLSI Systems, 19(4), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vlsi.automation.2022
7. Tan, J., & Feng, L. (2023). Hierarchical approaches to physical design in high-complexity VLSI chips. Science Open Papers, 3(1), 45-58. https://scienceopen.com/article/10.xxxx/hierarchical2023
8. Chandra, P., & Mehta, H. (2022). Power-aware placement and routing algorithms in nanotechnology nodes. MDPI Nanotechnology Series, 11(2), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.3390/nanodesign23
9. Miller, J., & Brown, R. (2022). Future challenges in thermal-aware placement for VLSI systems. Nature Nanotechnology Perspectives, 12(3), 45-56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/thermal23
10. Kim, H., & Lee, S. (2023). An integrated framework for VLSI physical design optimization. Springer Engineering Systems, 35(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/IntegratedFramework

