Livestock Healthcare and Farmer Contentment: An Exploration of Economic and Social Determinants
Abstract
Livestock production is essential to global agriculture, greatly contributing to food safety and regional economies. Sustainable agricultural operations must ensure the health and well-being of animals. This study investigates the complex connection between livestock healthcare and farmer satisfaction, considering the economic and social factors that impact this dynamic association. A growing number of stakeholders are concerned about the effective delivery of minor veterinary treatments due to India's severe workforce deficit in providing animal health care. The study intends to determine farmers' satisfaction with Para-veterinary assistance across four Indian states: Andhra Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, and Assam. The study compared weighted mean values across different states to assess and rank satisfaction with basic veterinarian treatments. Pearson's product-moment correlation study showed some intriguing results. Notably, there was a negative relationship between farmers' education levels and their satisfaction with Para-veterinary treatments. There was a positive relationship between the distance from the veterinarian hospital/dispensary and farmer satisfaction. The satisfaction of farmers with modest veterinary services was shown to be correlated with age and landholding. According to the findings, 55.48 percent of respondents expressed a moderate degree of satisfaction with Para-veterinary solutions, while 45.72 percent of participants expressed a high degree of satisfaction. Furthermore, farmers who were more satisfied with the health of their animals were satisfied with their farming experience overall. Addressing these characteristics is ultimately necessary for fostering ecological livestock farming techniques and improving the overall well-being of livestock and farmers.
References
Ghosh, S., Mukherjee, A., Kumar, U., Upadhyaya, A., &Sontakki, B. S. (2023). Finding bliss in the fields: an exploration of happiness factors of Indian farmers. CURRENT SCIENCE, 125(4), 369. Doi: 10.18520/cs/v125/i4/369-376
Grant, N., Buchanan, H., & Brennan, M. L. (2023). Factors within A Veterinarian-Cattle Farmer Relationship That May Impact on Biosecurity Being Carried out on Farms: An Exploratory Study. Veterinary Sciences, 10(7), 410. Doi: 10.3390/vetsci10070410
Li, J., Ma, W., & Gong, B. (2023). Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 941-960. Doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.09.037
Maposa, L., Garwe, E., &Nyamushamba, G. G. (2023). Factors Influencing Smallholder Farmers’ Preference for Veterinary Services Providers in Zimbabwe. Qeios. Doi: 10.32388/3ZKNHD
Schanz, L., Oehen, B., Benoit, M., Bernes, G., Magne, M. A., Martin, G., &Winckler, C. (2023). High work satisfaction despite high workload among European organic mixed livestock farmers: a mixed-method approach. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43(1), 4. Doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00852-x
Schriber-Hannah, C. (2023). The relaxed livestock farmer: The effect of coping strategies and leisure activities on farmer wellbeing and stress (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato). Doi: 10289/16081
Hansen, B. G., Langseth, E., & Berge, C. (2023). Animal welfare and cow-calf contact-farmers’ attitudes, experiences and adoption barriers. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 34-46. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.013
Drewry, J. L., Shutske, J. M., Trechter, D., Luck, B. D., & Pitman, L. (2019). Assessment of digital technology adoption and access barriers among crop, dairy and livestock producers in Wisconsin. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 165, 104960. Doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.104960
Daghagh Yazd, S., Wheeler, S. A., &Zuo, A. (2019). Key risk factors affecting farmers’ mental health: A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(23), 4849. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234849
Muri, K., Tufte, P. A., Coleman, G., & Moe, R. O. (2020). Exploring work‐related characteristics as predictors of norwegian sheep farmers’ affective job satisfaction. SociologiaRuralis, 60(3), 574-595. Doi: 10.1111/soru.12299
Balzani, A., & Hanlon, A. (2020). Factors that influence farmers’ views on farm animal welfare: A semi-systematic review and thematic analysis. Animals, 10(9), 1524. Doi: 10.3390/ani10091524
Waheed, A., Faraz, A., &Ishaq, H. M. (2020). A Study of Problems of Rural Farmers Keeping Desi Poultry in Southern Punjab. Punjab University Journal of Zoology, 35(2), 191-194. Doi: 10.17582/journal.pujz/2020.35.2.191.194
Vigors, B., Ewing, D. A., & Lawrence, A. B. (2021). The importance of farm animal health and natural behaviors to livestock farmers: findings from a factorial survey using vignettes. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2, 638782. Doi: 10.3389/fanim.2021.638782
Park, J. H., & Han, M. H. (2023). Enhancing livestock management with IoT-based wireless sensor networks: a comprehensive approach for health monitoring, location tracking, behavior analysis, and environmental optimization. Journal of Sustainable Urban Futures, 13(6), 34-46. Doi: 10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.442
Neethirajan, S. (2022). Affective State Recognition in Livestock-Artificial Intelligence Approaches. Animals: an Open Access Journal From MDPI, 12(6), 759-759. Doi: 10.3390/ani12060759
Liyanage, C. (2019). Burden of chronic kidney disease of uncertain etiology on families of patients and their coping behaviour in two farming communities in Sri Lanka. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Review, 4(1), 27. Doi: 10.18461/ijfsd.v14i2.F4
Hagen, B. N., Albright, A., Sargeant, J., Winder, C. B., Harper, S. L., O’Sullivan, T. L., & Jones-Bitton, A. (2019). Research trends in farmers’ mental health: A scoping review of mental health outcomes and interventions among farming populations worldwide. PLoS one, 14(12), e0225661. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225661
Jones, C. A., Parker, T. S., Ahearn, M. C., Mishra, A. K., &Variyam, J. N. (2009). Health status and health care access of farm and rural populations (No. 1476-2016-121002). Doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.54430
