Investigating the Link between Sterilization-Related Changes and Recurrent Canine Illnesses in Cured Dogs
Abstract
Canine sterilization, a widely used method for managing breed growth and promoting wellness, has been connected to specific biological variations. Although the operation is regarded as secure, there is a deficiency of information about possible long-term health consequences, particularly in dogs that have been healed. Controlling other variables, such as pre-existing healthcare issues and biological predispositions, is difficult. This study conducts a comprehensive investigation of biologically healthy street dogs in three locations in Rajasthan, India to analyze the prevalence of various illnesses. Additionally, we aimed to examine the relationship between the health of untreated dogs as well as the availability and length of animal birth control (NIO) services. The NIO administration implements sterilization and vaccination programs for unwanted canines as a means to manage their number and prevent the transmission of rabies. While it is recommended that these dogs be given to enhance their health, we provide information that similar advantages apply to unmanaged dogs in the environment. The seroprevalences of viral and microbial illness were evaluated in 250 physically healthy stray dogs from Nagpur, Thane and Nashik towns in Oct and Sep 2021. The incidence of ticks, fleas, battle wounds and physical indices were analyzed in those individuals, along with 55 more canines. Dogs residing in towns implementing an NIO system exhibited markedly (p < 0.05) improved generally physique circumstance evaluations, reduced incidence of open injuries probably resulting from fights, reduced prevalence of flea diseases, spreadable canine hepatitis, Ehrlichiacanis (EC), Leptospira interrogansserovars (LIS) and canine distemper virus antibodies (CDVA). Nevertheless, dogs residing in towns implementing NIO strategies had a notably greater frequency of infestations caused by the Brown Dog Tick (Rhipicephalussanguineus). The frequency of canine parvovirus and Brucellacanis (BC) did not show a significant difference across the towns. This research provides the first evidence of the therapeutic advantages of NIO on patients who have not received vaccinations or medical treatment for their disorders.
References
Rhodes, L., (2017). New approaches to non-surgical sterilization for dogs and cats: Opportunities and challenges. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, (52), pp.327-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12862
Kutzler, M.A., (2020). Gonad-sparing surgical sterilization in dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, (7), p.342. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00342
Silva, R.C., Paranzini, C.S., Franco, L.G., Miguel, M.P., Honsho, C.S. and Souza, F.F., (2018). Calcium chloride combined with dimethyl sulphoxide for the chemical sterilization of dogs. Reproduction in domestic animals, 53(6), pp.1330-1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13252
Kilian, E., Suchodolski, J.S., Hartmann, K., Mueller, R.S., Wess, G. and Unterer, S., (2018). Long-term effects of canine parvovirus infection in dogs. PloS one, 13(3), p.e0192198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192198
Mylonakis, M.E. and Theodorou, K.N., (2017). Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Acta Veterinaria, 67(3), pp.299-317. https://doi.org/10.1515/acve-2017-0025
Christensen, B.W., (2018). Canine prostate disease. Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice, 48(4), pp.701-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2018.02.012
McLean, N.J., Newkirk, K. and Adema, C.M., (2017). Canine ocular onchocerciasis: a retrospective review of the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of 16 cases in New Mexico (2011–2015). Veterinary ophthalmology, 20(4), pp.349-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12433
White, R., Atherly, T., Guard, B., Rossi, G., Wang, C., Mosher, C., Webb, C., Hill, S., Ackermann, M., Sciabarra, P. and Allenspach, K., (2017). Randomized, controlled trial evaluating the effect of multi-strain probiotic on the mucosal microbiota in canine idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut microbes, 8(5), pp.451-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2017.1334754
Kutzler, M.A., (2020). Possible relationship between long-term adverse health effects of gonad-removing surgical sterilization and luteinizing hormone in dogs. Animals, 10(4), p.599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040599
Rafatmah, D., Mogheiseh, A. and Eshghi, D., (2019). Chemical sterilization with intratesticular administration of zinc gluconate in adult dogs: A preliminary report. Basic and clinical andrology, (29), pp.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-019-0092-8
Baquero, O.S., da Silva Filho, A.P., Monsalve, S., Gebara, R.R., Garcia, R.D.C.M. and Sussai, S., (2020). Can sterilization help to prevent roaming in owned dogs and cats?. Research in veterinary science, (129), pp.180-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.01.021
Khatri, R., Poonam, M.H. and Minakshi, P.C., (2017). Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of canine parvovirus disease in dogs: A mini review abstract. Journal of Veteinary Science & Medical Diagnosis, (3), p.2. : 10.4172/2325-9590.1000233
Campino, L. and Maia, C., (2018). The role of reservoirs: canine leishmaniasis (pp. 59-83). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74186-4_3
Baneth, G., (2018). Antiprotozoal treatment of canine babesiosis. Veterinary parasitology, (254), pp.58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.03.001
Baxarias, M., Martínez-Orellana, P., Baneth, G. and Solano-Gallego, L., (2019). Immunotherapy in clinical canine leishmaniosis: a comparative update. Research in veterinary science, (125), pp.218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.06.009
