Gender As A Moderator In Behavioral Biases Affecting Investment Decision Accuracy And Performance

  • Ms. M. Krishna Priya
  • Dr. N. Periyasami
Keywords: Behavioural biases, Investment decision accuracy, Investment performance, Gender patterns

Abstract

Behavioural biases significantly impact investment decision accuracy and performance. This research explores how gender moderates these biases, analyzing differences in susceptibility between men and women. Despite extensive literature on behavioural finance, the gender-specific influence on investment outcomes remains underexplored. Addressing this gap, we conduct a quantitative analysis with a diverse sample of investors to identify key biases are overconfidence, loss aversion, and herd behaviour and their differential impacts. Our findings reveal distinct gender patterns in information processing and decision-making, influencing investment accuracy and performance. These insights offer valuable guidance for financial advisors and policymakers to develop gender-sensitive strategies, enhancing investment decision processes. This study enriches the behavioural finance literature by highlighting gender's nuanced role, promoting more inclusive and effective investment practices.

Author Biographies

Ms. M. Krishna Priya

PhD. Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, 608 002

Dr. N. Periyasami

Professor, Department of Commerce, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, 608 002

References

1. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292. doi:10.1162/003355301556400
2. Bhandari, G., & Deaves, R. (2006). The demographics of overconfidence. Journal of Behavioural Finance, 7(1), 5-11. doi:10.1207/s15427579jpfm0701_2
3. Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 20(4), 425-451. doi:10.1002/bdm.561
4. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474. doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448
5. Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Huang, H. (2009). Investor competence, trading frequency, and home bias. Management Science, 55(7), 1094-1106. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1035
6. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620-630. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x
7. Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., & Puncochar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 114-121. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.114
8. Olsen, R. A., & Cox, C. M. (2001). The influence of gender on the perception and response to investment risk: The case of professional investors. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(1), 29-36. doi:10.1207/S15327760JPFM0201_3
9. Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18
Published
2024-01-30
How to Cite
Ms. M. Krishna Priya, & Dr. N. Periyasami. (2024). Gender As A Moderator In Behavioral Biases Affecting Investment Decision Accuracy And Performance. Revista Electronica De Veterinaria, 25(1S), 276-280. Retrieved from https://veterinaria.org/index.php/REDVET/article/view/643