CBCT: Third Eye In Dental Oncology
Abstract
Background: The highest incidence of oral cancer is observed in South Asia, making it the Oral cancer with the sixth highest incidence worldwide. Less than 60% of patients survive for five years, indicating a high fatality rate. Preoperative diagnostic imaging modalities offer data on metastasis to distant locations, extension, and infiltration into nearby structures. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the modality of choice these days for analysing medullary changes and determining the extent of bony infiltration in the maxillofacial region. The literature proposes three patterns of bony invasion: the erosive, infiltrative, and mixed patterns. Aim: The purpose of this study is to analyse the patterns of bone invasion and its relationship with that of the mandibular canal. Methodology: This study included 50 CBCT images of patients with radiologically evident mandibular bone invasion and clinically and histopathologically diagnosed OSCC. By analysing the axial section of CBCT images, the bone invasion patterns are classified into three groups based on the erosive pattern, infiltrative and the mixed pattern. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS Version 22. P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Among 50 samples erosive, infiltrative, and mixed patterns were observed with a frequency of 30%, 20%, 50% respectively. As well as the comparison of IANC involvement to different patterns showing 10% in the erosive pattern, 16% in the infiltrative pattern, and 34% in the mixed pattern respectively. Conclusion: The evaluation of mandibular bone invasion patterns in patients with OSCC was done using CBCT. Fifty samples in all were chosen for the investigation and their different patterns of bony invasion were assessed. The mandibular canal exhibits the highest involvement in a mixed pattern.
References
2. Ramarathinum D, Rao G, Kumar N, Anehosur V, Desai AK. Digital volume tomography in the assessment of mandibular invasion in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity ‑ A prospective study. Saudi Dent J 2019;31:93‑8.
3. Pandey M, Rao LP, Das SR, Mathews A, Chacko EM, Naik BR, et al. Patterns of mandibular invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma of then mandibular region. World J Surg Oncol 2007;5:1‑6.
4. Li C, Lin J, Men Y, Yang W, Mi F, Li L. Does medullary versus cortical invasion of the mandible affect prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma?J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:403‑15.
5. Pałasz P, Adamski Ł, Górska‑Chrząstek M, Starzyńska A, Studniarek M. Contemporary diagnostic imaging of oral squamous cell carcinoma ‑ A review of literature. Pol J Radiol 2017;82:193‑202.
6. DeAngelis A, Breik O, Angel C, Goh C, Iseli T, Nastri A, et al. Can radiological examination of mandibular bone invasion accurately predict the need for mandibular resection in oral squamous cell carcinoma? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;48:576‑83.
7. Shah PH, Venkatesh R, More CB, Vassandacoumara V. A retrospective radiographic analysis of osseous changes in oral malignancy. J Indian AcadOral Med Radiol 2016;28:236.
8. Nakayama E. Imaging diagnosis for bone invasion by gingival carcinoma of the mandible: The value and the limitation. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2009;45:23‑30.