An Analysis of the Use of Snail Slime Collected by Sustainable Methods in Korean Cosmetic Creams
Keywords:
Snail slime, mucin, Korean cosmetics, sustainable sourcing, skincare, consumer perception
Abstract
Snail slime, scientifically referred to as snail mucin or secretion filtrate, has been a valued ingredient in Korean cosmetic formulations for its regenerative, hydrating, and anti-aging properties. However, ethical and environmental concerns regarding traditional snail farming and extraction methods have raised the need for sustainable practices. This research examines the role of sustainably collected snail slime in cosmetic creams within the Korean beauty industry. Drawing upon literature review, consumer perception surveys, and sustainability frameworks, this paper highlights the balance between innovation, ethics, and market growth. Findings suggest sustainable collection positively influences consumer trust, brand equity, and long-term industry viability.
References
1. Aflatooni, S., et al. (2023). Snails and skin: A systematic review on the effects of snail-based products on skin health. Journal of Integrative Dermatology.
2. Bae, J. (2021). The Rise of Snail Mucin in K-Beauty. Journal of Cosmetic Science.
3. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.
4. Business Wire. (2023). Global cruelty-free cosmetics market report.
5. Dermatology Times. (n.d.). Current clinical and aesthetic applications of snail mucin.
6. Euromonitor International. (2024). Ethical and sustainable beauty: Global trends.
7. Grand View Research. (2024). Cruelty-free cosmetics market size, share & trends analysis report.
8. Hindustan Times. (2024). Snail mucin alternatives: Vegan and cruelty-free options for radiant skin.
9. Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos. Food Quality and Preference, 25(1), 9–22.
10. Jang, H. (2022). Consumer perceptions of cruelty-free cosmetics in South Korea. Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(3), 211–225.
11. Kim, Y., et al. (2022). Snail mucin as a functional food ingredient for skin: Protection against UVB-induced photoaging. Journal of Functional Foods, 92, 105053.
12. Lee, H. & Park, S. (2020). Sustainable Cosmetics in Korea: Consumer Perceptions. Asian Journal of Beauty and Sustainability.
13. Lee, Y., & Ahn, J. (2020). The role of ethical certification in consumer decision- making for cosmetics. Asian Journal of Business Research, 10(2), 65–84.
14. Martinez-Moreno, R., García-Moreno, J., & Lopez, M. (2021). Advances in biotechnology for animal-free cosmetic ingredients. Biotechnology Advances, 49, 107754.
15. Müller, K., Rossi, F., & Becker, H. (2023). Cruelty-free extraction of snail secretion filtrate: Methods and bioactivity validation. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 45(1), 12–25.
16. McDermott, M., et al. (2021). Advancing the discovery of mucins’ function and application. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9, 734023.
17. Nguyen, T., & Lee, S. (2022). Greenwashing in the cosmetics industry: Consumer trust and ethical labels. Sustainability, 14(12), 7212.
18. COSRX Official Reports (2022). Ethical Mucin Extraction.
19. PETA. (n.d.). How is snail mucin collected, and is it cruel?
20. PETA. (2024). Snail mucin and cruelty in cosmetics. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
21. Park, J., & Kim, S. (2021). Ethical sourcing in Korean beauty: Challenges and opportunities in mucin-based skincare. Korean Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 55–72.
22. PW Consulting. (2024). Worldwide snail mucin skincare products market research report.
23. Mizon Research Institute (2021). Biochemical Benefits of Snail Secretion Filtrate.
24. Data (2023). Clean Beauty Trends in Asia-Pacific.
25. Singh, N., et al. (2024). Snail extract for skin: A review of uses, projections, and limitations. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 23(4), 1113–1121.
26. Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459.
27. Swaen, V., & Chumpitaz, R. (2008). Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 1–15.
28. The Guardian. (2025, May 8). From snail slime to salmon sperm: The K-beauty boom hits UK high streets.
29. Wired. (2024). Why snail mucin? Or, how this ancient practice became a skincare sensation.
30. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11(3107), 1–10.
2. Bae, J. (2021). The Rise of Snail Mucin in K-Beauty. Journal of Cosmetic Science.
3. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.
4. Business Wire. (2023). Global cruelty-free cosmetics market report.
5. Dermatology Times. (n.d.). Current clinical and aesthetic applications of snail mucin.
6. Euromonitor International. (2024). Ethical and sustainable beauty: Global trends.
7. Grand View Research. (2024). Cruelty-free cosmetics market size, share & trends analysis report.
8. Hindustan Times. (2024). Snail mucin alternatives: Vegan and cruelty-free options for radiant skin.
9. Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos. Food Quality and Preference, 25(1), 9–22.
10. Jang, H. (2022). Consumer perceptions of cruelty-free cosmetics in South Korea. Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(3), 211–225.
11. Kim, Y., et al. (2022). Snail mucin as a functional food ingredient for skin: Protection against UVB-induced photoaging. Journal of Functional Foods, 92, 105053.
12. Lee, H. & Park, S. (2020). Sustainable Cosmetics in Korea: Consumer Perceptions. Asian Journal of Beauty and Sustainability.
13. Lee, Y., & Ahn, J. (2020). The role of ethical certification in consumer decision- making for cosmetics. Asian Journal of Business Research, 10(2), 65–84.
14. Martinez-Moreno, R., García-Moreno, J., & Lopez, M. (2021). Advances in biotechnology for animal-free cosmetic ingredients. Biotechnology Advances, 49, 107754.
15. Müller, K., Rossi, F., & Becker, H. (2023). Cruelty-free extraction of snail secretion filtrate: Methods and bioactivity validation. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 45(1), 12–25.
16. McDermott, M., et al. (2021). Advancing the discovery of mucins’ function and application. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9, 734023.
17. Nguyen, T., & Lee, S. (2022). Greenwashing in the cosmetics industry: Consumer trust and ethical labels. Sustainability, 14(12), 7212.
18. COSRX Official Reports (2022). Ethical Mucin Extraction.
19. PETA. (n.d.). How is snail mucin collected, and is it cruel?
20. PETA. (2024). Snail mucin and cruelty in cosmetics. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
21. Park, J., & Kim, S. (2021). Ethical sourcing in Korean beauty: Challenges and opportunities in mucin-based skincare. Korean Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 55–72.
22. PW Consulting. (2024). Worldwide snail mucin skincare products market research report.
23. Mizon Research Institute (2021). Biochemical Benefits of Snail Secretion Filtrate.
24. Data (2023). Clean Beauty Trends in Asia-Pacific.
25. Singh, N., et al. (2024). Snail extract for skin: A review of uses, projections, and limitations. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 23(4), 1113–1121.
26. Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459.
27. Swaen, V., & Chumpitaz, R. (2008). Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 1–15.
28. The Guardian. (2025, May 8). From snail slime to salmon sperm: The K-beauty boom hits UK high streets.
29. Wired. (2024). Why snail mucin? Or, how this ancient practice became a skincare sensation.
30. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11(3107), 1–10.
Published
2024-09-12
How to Cite
Dr. Nishtha Dwivedi, & Saroosh Ahmad Mir. (2024). An Analysis of the Use of Snail Slime Collected by Sustainable Methods in Korean Cosmetic Creams. Revista Electronica De Veterinaria, 25(2), 2256-2261. https://doi.org/10.69980/redvet.v25i2.2165
Section
Articles
